I've had too many terrible or dangerous cab rides to be so blasé about the difference.
The article's whole point is that because Uber underprices their service, it could be cheaper to avoid public transit entirely.
Hardly surprising that it provides a superior service when Uber subsidizes up to 60% of the passenger fares.
Their entire business model does, however, rely upon jacking up prices substantially at some point, to both recoup those losses and to make shareholders happy.
The question you should ask yourself isn't "is Uber superior now?" but "is it superior if it's 3x the price it is now?".
As in each and every Uber ride is subsidized to the tune of a few dollars???!!!!
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/uber-true-cost-uh-oh
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-25/uber-lose...
IIRC, there were Amtrak routes in the Northeast that became very popular, and the gov't was bleeding money increasing the amount of service because every ride was subsidized by something like $10-$20/ride.