> However, it might well reduce the death rate, and that's better than nothing.
Multiple studies [1] found no effect.
> In America, you are far more likely to be killed by a toddler than by a terrorist.
You can pick a day when a toddler killed someone but no terror attack happened. But if you look a longer timeframe, it's not even close. Especially if you include 3,000 people who were killed on 9/11.
Besides, you can make your chances of being shot by a toddler zero by not buying a gun, or by locking it up in a safe. Can't do that with terrorism.
> A thousand a month. It's not good.
No it's not. Most are gang related. Maybe it's time to look at war on drugs?
> How many human lives are those actually worth?
You need to also look at how many human lives are saved by guns. Do you think Petit family members [2] were glad they did not have a gun in the house?
> Is murdering wildlife something that anyone should applaud?
You can't murder wildlife. Murder is the unlawful killing of another human.
> Do people make holes in paper with assault rifles?
Yes, the army. Civilians in the US cannot buy assault rifles since 1986.
You probably meant assault weapons. Those are widely available outside of a couple of states with ridiculous laws like NY and CA.
The point of making holes in paper is to learn gun control. You want to control the gun so that you can make the holes where you want them when you want them, and not make holes where you don't.
I wish the police made more holes in paper [3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban#St...
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheshire,_Connecticut,_home_in...
[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Empire_State_Building_sho...