PR 101 for engineers
medium.com
medium.com
Thanks again! ~Sean
I was a reporter for years, and I used to talk and write about it:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzcEIIxKcYncbUk2ZjRHS1hmQUk...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzcEIIxKcYncOHd4VTBrU29ObFE...
-- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent#Five_fil...
I shared some of my stories here, a while ago: https://medium.com/simone-brunozzi/f-ck-you-vs-thank-you-b25...
(and of course I could do that because I am no longer employed by AWS - I left in 2014).
Happy to hear your comments about it.
Given that, do you think there'll be issues with having this blog up?
I wouldn't be surprised if your facebook friend said something in passing and not thought about it for more than a second or two, but because you made some intermediary look slightly bad in the eyes of their hero, you lost your potential for promotion. Sad. I hope you've moved on.
That said, I don't really get your examples or your message.
It sounds more like you got ensnared in a few things that could happen at any company. You acknowledge this in the end, but you also said:
The more I worked at Amazon, the more I felt that certain aspects of its
culture were so toxic for me that I was barely able to keep going.
As to your examples, it doesn't sound like your situation was like the "Bonnie Situation" at all. Your PM asked you to source PR opportunities. You reached out to an event organizer. The organizer messaged your colleagues (without necessarily violating the NDA.) You got blowback because he followed up with your company's general PR channels. (Was there a mutual expectation that he only followup with you?) Unlike the "Bonnie Situation," you weren't pulled into trouble, you were the one shooting the gun. It sounds like you'd have no way to blame "Faras." Your choices (and bad luck) led to the blowback. It'd be on you and maybe flow up to your PM. Another key difference is that there isn't an attempted cover-up for reasons disproportionate to the severity of the crime.Also, your example re: your FB post with (happy) swearing doesn't seem unjust, especially if you're (my assumption) using your FB profile to promote AMZN products. You're saying this incident tipped you away from getting a promotion. Respectfully, I doubt that's accurate.
That said, I think there is a balance, and getting that sort of feedback early on for what is typically a pretty small investment of time and energy in terms of PR can be immensely helpful. It can be a defining moment of understanding product/market fit, especially if you get any negative press that spells out exactly what you're doing wrong.
First, it is way, way too slow to iterate. Second, the press is not your customer.
For starters, if the press doesn't like your product, odds are they will give some hints as to why. They may not spell out exactly what you should change, but they should give some hints as to why they are not happy (and it may not be what they say you should change).
In terms of speed, odds are you aren't going to get a massive press hit right off the bat. It will probably be some industry/niche blogs, local publications, etc. You only need a couple to start observing trends, and from there you iterate. Roll out the improvements, test it, and hell, even reach out to the reporters and ask if they like it better. It may get you follow-up press, and even if it doesn't, hopefully you'll get some useful feedback.
If you want attention from VCs, or to boost your personal brand, it's less important to have product/market fit, a scalable product, an optimized funnel, or even a published product.
Step 0 is to figure out why you want to do press outreach in the first place.
That'd be nice if the title could be edited.