Perhaps the fear here, as was then, is not entirely justified. Just because something is possible does not make it probable. But if it gets people off their ass and organizing to defend their positions, all the better.
If Obama had asked for registry of all the gun shops and their owners a month before taking office after years of calling for taking away guns, then, sure, go ahead and make the comparison. Otherwise its just a misleading false equivalency.
The fact that a candidate may have asked for lists of client scientists after calling climate change a hoax, and that from this alone you extrapolate that he must be aiming to delete their data, is association fallacy.
You have ignored the actual contents of my post.
On one side of this, the "what" is nonexistent or completely fabricated. On the other side, there are unprecedented and chilling political demands.
The view from 30,000 feet can make dissimilar things look similar, but that doesn't mean that it's the best view. Details matter.
This is what Trump said:
"That includes canceling billions in climate change spending for the United Nations"