IMO, encyclopaedias aren't meant for obscure topics. And any products or services with a focus on curation have to discriminate. Of course the criteria for doing so will probably always be controversial.
IMO, encyclopaedias aren't meant for obscure topics. And any products or services with a focus on curation have to discriminate. Of course the criteria for doing so will probably always be controversial.
I'm a bit confused by this reasoning. I can see space considerations in a paper environment, but not on a wiki. Why wouldn't Wikipedia try to be the home of all knowledge?
I'm looking forward to seeing Infogalactic give Wikipedia a run for its money!
Request an account?!? What an exclusionary language. How did I find that out? Because I tried to make a tiny edit. Then found out I need an account. Then that I need to 'request' account. Yeah, no, infogalactic just lost me forever.
A very nice example of barriers to participation in action.
>Infogalactic has the right to block or ban any user for any reason whatsoever.
Even more totalitarian language... infogalactic seems to be less inclusive & open than wikipedia today.