The Inner Ring (1944)
lewissociety.org
lewissociety.org
This essay originated as the Memorial Lecture at King’s College, University of London. Absolutely essential reading. I discovered it as an undergrad and it's possibly more relevant today than it was in 1944.
> It is tiring and unhealthy to lose your Saturday afternoons: but to have them free because you don’t matter, that is much worse.
―Sydney J. Harris
Others, meanwhile, want to ever the ring of "anti-VC-establishment enlightened", etc.
And somr just want the fleeting ring of "highly-rated commenters", but they are a silly lot with no self-awareness. :P
VC money, on the other hand, is real money... And you need "introductions" to get it. They almost outright admit that the entire thing is an inner ring.
I strongly disagree!
First, while those are his early examples, he later discusses how even the rejection of money and public status is another form of wanting-to-belong:
>> People who believe themselves to be free, and indeed are free, from snobbery, and who read satires on snobbery with tranquil superiority, may be devoured by the desire in another form. It may be the very intensity of their desire to enter some quite different Ring which renders them immune from all the allurements of high life.
>> An invitation from a duchess would be very cold comfort to a man smarting under the sense of exclusion from some artistic or communistic côterie. Poor man—it is not large, lighted rooms, or champagne, or even scandals about peers and Cabinet Ministers that he wants: it is the sacred little attic or studio, the heads bent together, the fog of tobacco smoke, and the delicious knowledge that we—we four or five all huddled beside this stove—are the people who know.
Secondly, he explicitly states that money and status are _not_ the desire that tempts people over the line:
>> And you will be drawn in, if you are drawn in, not by desire for gain or ease, but simply because at that moment, when the cup was so near your lips, you cannot bear to be thrust back again into the cold outer world.
TLDR: It's a cautionary speech about people idolizing a group and the corruptive desire to belong to that group, totally regardless of how the group is defined.
That being said, I don't think that dreams of higher rings motivate participation here. Some, perhaps. But most comments I see, even those I don't like, appear to be driven by curiosity, shared interests, and simple desire to express one's generally incorrect opinion. There is definitely a rampant sense of smug elitism, but that's more of a dead end than the entrance to a rabbit hole.