“Exhalation” by Ted Chiang (2008)
lightspeedmagazine.com
lightspeedmagazine.com
Read it here: http://subterraneanpress.com/magazine/fall_2010/fiction_the_...
I disagree with your implication that a Hollywood adaptation is the ultimate aspiration of all written works.
So far I have read "Story of your life", "Exhalation", "72 letters", "Merchant and the Alchemist's Gate", "Divide by Zero", "Understand", "What's Expected of us", and "Hell is the Absence of God". I am about 50% through "Lifecycle of Software Objects".
So far, the stories all seem built on the foundation that we reside in an immutable clockwork universe and that the notion of "Free Will" is a complete illusion. It is this combination of absence of free will and "the future is already set and there is nothing you can do about it" that I find depressing. That I am merely a meat robot programmed to act in specific ways and that my actions therefore have no real meaning (because they are no chosen, but simply a result of my program).
The only real exception so far as been "Hell is the Absence of God" which was a black comedy exploration of "what if there really was a God, and he was a complete asshole?" which was depressing in it's own special way :)
That said... On the whole I find Chiang's stories engaging, imaginative, and well crafted. Recommended reading if you like near-future science fiction, AI, time travel, or genetics.
> So far, the stories all seem built on the foundation that we reside in an immutable clockwork universe and that the notion of "Free Will" is a complete illusion.
I do not find this depressing, because that is how reality appears to me. I can't say for sure if that's what Ted Chiang thinks as well, but the way I interpret his work is that he is attempting to point out the beauty in the universe as it is, not as it might appear to be. The protagonist of Exhalation is a perfect example. Having pulled aside the veil to the inner workings of his mind (the movement of air through intricate channels is in principle, deterministic, there is hardly room for "free will"), he finds greater understanding and an expansive wonder at what life is, not depression.
There's a story I read a few years ago, I think from Wilson, about the universe as it stretches out in time, hundreds of trillions of years from now, into the heat death of the universe. It's the same concept, thermodynamics, but a different scope.
... which is not precisely an argument against free will. Imho it's a close cousin though.
Stepping back though, it's a voyage of inquiry and discovery and subsequent changes in civilization. None of that challenges free will, any more than fMRI does in our world. We have peered into the brain, and seen electrical signals that we don't understand. When we die, these go away, never to return.
(ob not xkcd: stimulus, response, stimulus response. Don't you ever think?)
To me, lack of free will isn't a problem as long as there aren't entities that can (or will) take advantage of that. It feels like worrying about the heat-death of the universe (appropriately enough).
I assume it's coming up because the movie Arrival [1] is based on Chiang's "Story of you Life" [2]?
Ted Chiang on Seeing His Stories Adapted and the Ever-Expanding Popularity of SF
Arrival was, well it was a Hollywood movie, but I was so glad to see linguists in a film I had to see it and enjoy it.
I disagree- these mechanical people are well-nigh immortal and will leave to see the end of their world, no one alive today on earth will live to see the heat death of the universe. However, we might just get to experience the effects of climate change.
The beauty of literature is we can both the right - our interpretations of the work is what matters. Additionally, while they are inspired by them,authors do not necessarily do a 1:1 mapping of real world issues to their stories