kalleboo@Synology:~$ ed
-sh: ed: command not found
kalleboo@Synology:~$ vi
~ VIM - Vi IMproved
ahSnark aside, it's a very well-written tutorial! I'm sure I'll end up referring to it at some point in the future.
kalleboo@Synology:~$ ed
-sh: ed: command not found
kalleboo@Synology:~$ vi
~ VIM - Vi IMproved
ahSnark aside, it's a very well-written tutorial! I'm sure I'll end up referring to it at some point in the future.
I would love to know if you're using Arch Linux? There's got to be a good story about why it's not there, if not. Might be fun to hunt down if so (I like historical stories about that sort of decision making).
Why do we include multiple text editors by default?
Good point let’s just pick one for the base install.
Obvious choice is Vi not Ed because more people are familiar with the former.
Admittedly, the code does date back to 1984 in places.
I would have thought there'd be utility in having a very small last-resort utility like ed by default. But then I don't use Vi much (or ed, normally I'm just touching up a file from the command line, so I use nano), so perhaps I'm out of touch.
And then it turned out that a lot of the platforms people run the scripts on, they had to install ed explicitly! Ha. Sorry, Arch/Debian/Fedora/Centos/OpenSUSE users.
If you don't believe me, look how many times 'ed' is installed on this page. :) https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit/blob/ma...