Google, Microsoft Bidding For Digg
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I keep coming up against this idea that VC money is increasingly becoming a competitive disadvantage. It seems that the companies that have taken VC money end up having to go for much higher valuations to exit, otherwise the VC's don't get theirs. Meanwhile, companies that have managed to get by on no funding or on angel funding alone are able to exit much sooner for much lower valuations, and the founders probably make out just as well if not better.
Rumor mill has it that Digg has been on the market for several years now. I have to imagine that part of that inability to sell the company has been because of it's 2 rounds of VC funding.
Two, I'm totally with you on the value to founders between taking lots of funding and getting a massive exit vs. taking a little bit of funding and having a lower exit. It may not translate into two radically different paydays. If anyone has any more insight into this, I'd be interested to know.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_33/b3997001....
"People in the know say Digg is easily worth more than $200M"