For context, here's population http://i.imgur.com/mcA2hWa.jpg.
Kind of obvious, but a lot of infrastructure (esp. for resource extraction) is far away from centers of population.
Kind of obvious, but a lot of infrastructure (esp. for resource extraction) is far away from centers of population.
Energy generation is another rural activity. Although solar is fine on roofs[1], wind is rather annoying to live next to and with the possibility of fire when those turbines go best kept away from town. Coal, gas, and nuclear power plants aren't very welcome either.
1) even then, I get the feeling a lot of architects would rather have green spaces instead.
2) ok, well turkeys as we raise them are not an outdoor animal
It was interesting to see just how notably absent windpower was in the South (excluding Texas). What's the reason for such apparent opposition to it? Curious.
Plus, wind power (traditional) does kill birds and bats so there is a problems there.
1) it does apparently given the UK experience improve the fishing
First of all, the South is quite flat (sort of surprised at other response saying it's not.) That means that there aren't ridges where you can get some easy benefit from elevation. The South also isn't very windy.
Corrosion is also a huge issue. It's humid, and on the coasts, where there might actually be some wind, you get salt too. Think of how quickly cars fall apart in regions that salt heavily in winter. Now imagine doing that year-round to machines that have to be built with some measure of precision in order to extract the most energy reasonably possible.
The only place I've ever seen windmills in the South is Corpus Christi, and I can only imagine the unfortunate people who have to keep those working. That's pretty much it for the South; you don't see many more until you get into the mountains (some in VA and probably TN.) Texas has tons of wind power, but but only in the parts that wouldn't really be considered the South; they're all in the NW part of the state.
I won't purport to be an expert, but as I've driven around, the places that struck me as having pretty successful wind farms were Central valley in CA, Eastern CO, and Southern MN and WI.
http://www.ktxs.com/news/big-country/new-wind-farm-going-up-...
http://www.nrel.gov/gis/wind.html
It's not very windy in the south, relatively speaking.
The interstates and railways through ID, WY, or NE aren't there for the people of those states - there to connect CA and WA to the east coast.
Really? How else are the people of those states going to get the things they produce (whethee by mining, farming, or otherwise) to outside domestic or, by way of seaports, overseas markets?