I'm having a hard time reading this. Is this proper English? Serious question from a non-native speaker.
I'm having a hard time reading this. Is this proper English? Serious question from a non-native speaker.
No, but his slang is deliberate wordplay.
Take note of the author's page: http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/about-derek-lowe
The author is from Arkansas (the South). Even though he has an advanced degree from a prestigious university and knows what "proper English" is, it seems he likes to play with Southern dialect.
The journal he's writing for ('A'AAS) is 'A'merican so native readers (even those outside of the South) will understand the slang.
It looks like 99% of his hundreds of blog articles have straightforward serious titles but a few have cutesy irreverent ones. A few more examples of Southern colloquialisms such as "gosh", "darn", and "dang":
>Gosh, Fellows, There’s a Better Way http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2016/08/26/gos...
>The Papers In This Journal Are Just So Darn Relevant http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2012/07/03/the...
>Biosimilars: Not So Dang Easy http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2010/05/18/bio...
Try some appalachian dialects, ow lawd 'av mercy.
Ain't nobody gon' understand them folk but the devil trees they live under.
spits into a bucket and continues carving a squirrel mantlepiece
To answer the original question: the article is explicitly humorous whike also using the correct language for the topic. It's meant to be "harder to read" as a way to add a layer of wordplay.
"I wonder what would happen if I ran my small-block Chevy on some hydrazine? Because Nitrous injection is for wimps."
(Hydrazine is highly toxic and dangerously unstable unless handled in solution.)
Nice.
"this here" is a colloquialism in some places in (I think) the US.
But I suspect they would have had to subtitled it :-)
Though it is right of course, i.e. Southern American is different from South American.
Compare:
We have a communication failure.
What we've got here, is failure to c'mmunicate.
"Have" is the base word. "Have got" is the same as "have", but with more "havingness" somehow. "Have got here" is also "have", but with so much "havingness" that you might find yourself unable to get rid of whatever it is without a severe beating. And with "what <subj> have got here is", well, you're just going to get shot.You can ignore the "here".
To read it more easily, try removing the word 'here'.
We've got ourselves a linguistic prescriptivist here, folks... String him up. ;-)
> acrolect
I just learned two new words, and I like words. Thanks!
I take it as redneck humor, as in famous last words of "Hey ya'll, watch this"
... it makes a lot more sense.