An Open Letter to My Boss, IBM CEO Ms. Ginni Rometty
shift.newco.co
shift.newco.co
The US has had bad presidents before, and will certainly have them in the future. At no point so far has the CEO of IBM done anything wrong -- and when she does, that will be the time to criticize her. Until then, this is a CEO trying to promote her company to the incoming administration, and nothing more.
This is my favorite part:
> A look at IBM recruitment collateral suggests that the future of the company hinges on realizing an inclusive and welcoming culture, though you do not communicate this vision within the many pages of your letter to a man who will soon be in the top office of the United States government.
The letter is barely 4 pages long printed on US letter-sized paper. Where are the "many pages?"
People like this are impossible to please.
Here's a person who didn't agree with the stand the ceo of her company took. Resigned because she felt morally responsible and announced it because she thought it was the right thing to do. Irrespective of content, that shows principles, integrity, courage and maturity. So again what exactly should an "adult" have told her?
Here's that report.[1]
[1] https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Kamen...
I'm not a US citizen nor an IBMer, so this interests me only as an outsider. While precious little will change with an 'open letter' like this, since when has having an opinion, resigning due to principles or "saying something" a bad thing?
The way I read it was a person who took a stand and announced it. Nothing more. Why are the commenters here inferring entitlement, immaturity or anything besides an opinion.
To suggest that the IBM of today is the same as the IBM of that time is absurd, and constitutes an odd kind of essentialism whereby the character of a corporation never changes even though every single person who worked there has been replaced. It ascribes motive, personality, and an unchanging nature to a corporation rather than to the people who run it.
Have to admire her attempt at getting some self-exposure seeing as she is unemployed with no prospects, I suppose.
Did we learn absolutely nothing from the Mozilla-Eich fiasco?