The issues this group has chosen to focus on--global warming and the release of endocrine disruptors into the environment--are ones where the damage is exceedingly difficult to undo once done. In contrast, a current lack of investment in GMOs does nothing to prevent GMO development in the future. (How often do you hear someone describe decreased development of GMOs as a "crisis"?) So there are perfectly defensible reasons for them to prioritize global warming and endocrine disruption over GMOs, and no basis in this document for an accusation that this group is acting from purely political motives (for which you cite no evidence beyond the absence of GMOs from their agenda).