[1] due to their own reckless behavior / Capitalism on the upside, Socialism on the downside.
[1] due to their own reckless behavior / Capitalism on the upside, Socialism on the downside.
40% of the internet hitting Bing would potentially overwhelm it. Keep in mind the subprime mortgage crisis was several banks. Add microsoft and google, the world would panic.
Facebook sees 1/3 traffic of google. Just like a run on banks, people desperate for info would prob level news sites maybe even FB.
Consider that outside of content/services we have providers. Verizon down. At&t down. Overwhelm the other towers or broadband failure.
Leaving aside how disgusting it is that these are actively encouraged monopolies and kill innovation & competition, it is dangerous.
1% of Germany lost internet TODAY. Deutsche telkom hit with ddos. 5 Banks in Russia 2 weeks ago. Oct 21 we all remember what happened to dyn.
This isn't even hypothetical, literally getting worse daily.
This is not accurate. The _ability_ of an ISP to route packets is not affected if another ISP stops routing packets (their ability to rout packets is independent). There will be a change in bandwidth usage but not in ability. If a TBTF bank goes down, it is entirely possible that other banks have financial contracts with it that are necessary to be fulfilled for the second bank to remain operational (their ability to route financial payments is dependent)
Here is my problem with banking, if naive, please inform me: Banking should be treated like any other base infrastructure. Financial infrastructure is critical. It is not ok for the foundation of modern commerce and civilization to be controlled by so few. We need to revamp our financial situation. period.
http://www.motherjones.com/files/images/big-bank-theory-char...