If we were discussing whether pavel_lishin was a good person, would ad hominem be off limits to you? It doesn't make sense to call out a "think of the children" when we're actually discussing dangers to children.
Simply claiming a fallacy is not a discussion or a rebuttal. Also, there is no "but think of the children" fallacy. You may be thinking of the Emotional Appeal fallacy, but even then it isn't always a fallacy to point out potential dangers to children.
Alright, both of you folks are absolutely correct - 'think of the children', in the context of 'is X safe for children?' is an appropriate use of same. Snark retracted :-)