Donald Trump claims 'millions voted illegally' but offers no evidence

theguardian.com

3 pointsCeezy4 comments

He doesn't need "evidence". He just knows.

How dare Trump make unsubstantiated claims! Only Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton are allowed to make those.

The article does a fair job of pointing it there is no evidence for either sides claims, but the title is worded to mislead. Where is the title "Jill Stein claims vote hacking but offers no evidence"?

The difference is, one side says they think something may have happened, and want an independent audit (recount) to determine if it did.

The other side makes claims as if they are fact, to try and change people's opinion of what actually happened (ie who won the popular vote) and specifically doesn't want any investigation/recount.

Both sides are making unsubstantiated claims and speaking as if they are facts.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com