Meat eating diets(especially red meat) show increased risk of heart disease in so many studies it's a definite fact.
You have a rather naive definition of "fact" my friend.
You have a rather naive definition of "fact" my friend.
If two of the top hospitals in the world for cardiac care say it I'm willing to bet it's fact.
[1]https://health.clevelandclinic.org/2015/05/your-diet-and-hea...
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullart...
FACT does not mean that it is 100% true - you do not publish one piece of research and all of a sudden, it's FACT.
In science, nothing is ever 100%.
p.s not trying to advocate its bs aand we can eat all the meat we like, im a vegetarian.
Here's one example of terrible reporting: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/26/bacon-ham-sa...
> Processed meats rank alongside smoking as cancer causes – WHO
> UN health body says bacon, sausages and ham among most carcinogenic substances along with cigarettes, alcohol, asbestos and arsenic
This headline is mixing up 2 things: the quality of the evidence (which is now as good as the evidence we have that smoking etc cause cancer) and the strength of the effect (smoking is very much more harmful than eating red meat).
It's frustrating that the news reporting was so bad, because it's caused people to reject the science: we know, with a high level of confidence, that processed red meat can cause cancer, although it probably doesn't cause very many cases of cancer.