The CEO of Reddit confessed to modifying posts from Trump supporters
yahoo.com
yahoo.com
This totally calls into question the credibility of the whole site.
I knew this sort of thing was going to happen and stopped using most social media.
These new platforms like Twitter, Reddit, Facebook etc are devolving into the same sort of ban happy in group out group tribalism you get on irc channels Where some clique has all the oper accounts and anyone who has even the slightest disagreement is banned.
I would rather use a much smaller bbs or forum that does not censor rather then a huge social media platform where anything you say could get you booted if it rubs the censors the wrong way.
As hacker news is the same sort of "social media" as reddit, you certainly haven't stopped using it at all.
This sole responsibility is predicated upon user content not being tampered with, except for removal for moderation or administrative purposes.
This act is unprecedented and not accounted for in their own legal agreements with users. User trust aside, does this impact their ability to enforce their user agreements?
What's to stop a u/spez with rustled jimmies finding someone he doesn't like, then editing their comment in such a way that it suddenly becomes libellous? How could the commenter possibly prove that they didn't write that comment?
Kids were trolling, he trolled back. Reddit is a fun site, what do you really expect?
Personally I think it's funny.
If the admins have the ability to modify posts and comments without any notice or indication, this opens the door to... - Creating false content via discrete edits that violate ToS, allowing for false flag to ban a user/thread/subreddit - Any comment or post used as evidence (ahem, e.g. Hillary Clinton's IT guy, mention of drugs or crimes, literally anything like that) now is called into question. Wouldn't surprise me if he now has to testify that posts were not altered if it is accepted as evidence, etc. - Literally anything else where a verified identity post and people assume it is what they (the person) said. AMAs are basically the thing that took Reddit mainstream, so that is kind of a big deal.
Maybe the posts on the site shouldn't be afforded the assumption of integrity? Trump's supporters have already taken over the front page with a constant barrage of false "news" stories and a fanatical devotion to defend them.
There's no reason you shouldn't apply the classic 4-chan disclaimer to reddit as well:
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
And not just on hacker news. What if the same thing happened on twitter or facebook?
People can say what they want about having access controls in place to prevent this but at the end of the day there is a DBA with super user access to the database, there always is.
If you can't hack that messages on these platforms don't carry any integrity then maybe you shouldn't use them.
I suspect you don't have to dig very deep to find out that quite a bit of squelching was being done on several subreddits.
One needs to look no further than the spam that has made youtube comments a no-mans land of crass stupidity to see why a fairly broad brush of modding is req'd to keep some reasonable level of maturity.