I guess if you compare to someplace like Arizona where if you spin out you just end up in sand instead of hitting a tree, sure, but why single out MA instead of just anyplace with trees? :)
I guess if you compare to someplace like Arizona where if you spin out you just end up in sand instead of hitting a tree, sure, but why single out MA instead of just anyplace with trees? :)
That being said, there's only one tree left, cause that last accident killed the tree they hit.
But at some point, a reasonable standard must be set, and if you can't drive safely you shouldn't be driving. Clearing obstructions on the side of the road won't really help if you're spinning out of control on a busy highway.
At that speed, I'd rather have hit a tree.
Point is, when the roads are narrow, and you know that any mistake will cost you money at the body shop, you don't travel at dangerous speeds.
These roads are considered "pleasure roads" and date back to the day when a drive in the outdoors was primarily recreational. The roads connect and traverse major parklands.
DCR is not part of MassDOT (Department of Transportation). These roads are not necessarily built to traditional highway standards.
For example, trees along Memorial Drive and the Jamaicaway are closer to the roadway than would generally be recommended. These characteristics are linked to the historic character of these roads and their surrounds. Periodically, there will be plans to change the roads in some way, but they are usually met with significant pushback (neighbors, parks people, preservationists). On the other hand, the DCR for years resisted standard pedestrian crossings as well.
Currently, I think there is a slow trend to make these roads more standard where possible but also slow traffic speeds and improve pedestrian access.
And admittedly AZ is easy. Passing in the oncoming lane while going 90 is a pretty comfortable thing there.