So it tells you what to draw, then it tells you what you drew, and that is useful and/or amazing?
It merely shows that it's able to pick the correct name from a finite list of possible names that could very well be small (e.g. 10 or 20 object names).
A better way to demonstrate that the ANN is truly able to recognize objects with good accuracy would be to ask a person to draw an unspecified object and guess its name.
If the goal is to acquire training data, they could still ask for a name in case of failure.