Wikileaks latest insurance files don't match hashes
np.reddit.com
np.reddit.com
Publishing the hashes is meant to serve as a canary for this exact class of concern.
Furthermore we have not seen any public appearances from Assange since his Internet access was cut, nor has anything been signed with his pgp key.
edit: upon further consideration there might be alternative explanations, but we would still need more evidence furnished to believe wikileaks sources credibly. No explanation or acknowledgement has been provided for the checksum mismatches.
might have nsfw ads watch out
Which would mean that the KGB had conducted a fairly elaborate operation on British soil, something that would be inconvenient to air. So, Assange as a public figure would still be history, if that's the case.
If not, how can they guarantee that the information/evidence contained therein is current enough to generate high impact?
Times change, and some of us once thought a businessman with a questionable past and unsavory connections would never be elected president. Which is to say: what the public gets outraged about today may not be much of anything tomorrow.
Basically the idea behind it is that this temporary empathy, followed by apathy and inaction by us after events is a political construct, to prevent the emergence of mass movements.