...illegally (worth putting in the headline methinks).
Surely Apple's counsel knows US law. I don't think they're that dumb, but it surprises me they're that unethical. Then again, Gizmodo are creeps too - maybe they're suited for each other.
Surely Apple's counsel knows US law. I don't think they're that dumb, but it surprises me they're that unethical. Then again, Gizmodo are creeps too - maybe they're suited for each other.
Was this a typo? The search was conducted by police, not Apple. This is a criminal matter, not a civil one.
I am saying that Apple asked the police to raid the property.
Clear evidence that their quest for world domination has gone too far.
I personally also pay more attention and go beyond the call for higher profile projects. That doesn't mean I'm involved in some kind of conspiracy.
Beyond that, could you point out the source of your assertion that Apple requested this? I missed it in the article, and that's the conspiracy you've raised.
I'm not sure what the alternative would be.
2. "If I were Apple, I would have done X" does not in any way imply "Apple did X".
2. Agreed. There may be a remote chance the police just read the internet and really, really care about apple. But I doubt it.