That's the effect of a (quasi) monopoly.
It's like a DC politician who's above the law - you have so much power that you can literally do what you want.
The solution? Stop using products of the biggest players and start looking for alternatives.
It's like a DC politician who's above the law - you have so much power that you can literally do what you want.
The solution? Stop using products of the biggest players and start looking for alternatives.
They don't support users because of arrogance. There is no viable alternative, they know that. And even if it costs them more revenue than the total costs of a support team, Google's culture is so accustomed to lavish spending that even 1B in lost revenue is just a blip on the radar.
If your account is worth more than a few cents, they'll gladly speak to you.
KLM doesn't have flights for 3 cents, so doesn't have such a support-timewaster problem.
An account holder chosen at random is most likely to be in the former category, unlike klm where a customer chosen at random is likely to have a much higher margin worthy of a few dollars of support costs.
Some might argue a company should support a customer well even if doing so puts that customer as a lifetime lossmaker though.
The same way Amazon does? How about banks, airlines and other similar.
I understand that there's little motivation for some online services to improve their customer service experience but Google is especially bad. Even when making a purchase from them (an area where both Apple and Microsoft do much better), you're dealing with a bot with absolutely no other contact point.