New MacBook Pro is selling like crazy
google.com
google.com
Lots of people have been complaining online that the new macbook pro isn't a 'pro' machine because it sacrifices performance for portability. The new macbook pro is really the spiritual successor to the macbook air laptops with upgraded hardware. Another way of thinking about it is that instead of making a faster pro, apple made the pro smaller and gave it great battery life.
There's a very vocal segment of the macbook pro market who's really mad about this. And fair enough - Apple is genuinely no longer catering to the market segment who want a powerhouse you can lug between meetings. But the sales numbers clearly show those users are a minority. For all the noise, almost nobody needs 32 gigs of ram[1]. (Really, most people don't need more than 8.)
I think the majority of users just want a decently performing laptop (check) which looks good (check), is small and light (check) and has great battery life and a decent screen (check and check). ... And doesn't come pre-installed with all the awful manufacturer software you get on modern windows laptops.
I had a look at one in the shop yesterday - the new 13" macbook pro is barely bigger than my old 11" air. Except for the price the new machine is exactly what I want in a replacement laptop. And this is the first laptop apple has released in years for which I can say that - the new macbook is too gutless, the air has a crappy screen and the old pro line was too heavy. Except for the price, I think apple has released a fantastic product.
> I think the majority of users
I do agree that the new Mac Book Pro is what majority of the users want, unfourtanatly professional users are the minority and the Pro is supposed to cater to this minority.
The other reason people have certain expectations is: the price tag.
I am aware that the RAM tradeoff was done to have a great battery life, which is great for people who need mobility, however those people are probably going to buy an Air anyway.
Most professionals don't need a more powerful machine. I certainly don't - I've been using a 4 year old macbook air for development work (with 8 gigs of ram) since 2012. Honestly, its been fine. The biggest problem I have developing on it is (surprisingly) SSD speed.
> which is great for people who need mobility, however those people are probably going to buy an Air anyway.
The air is being discontinued. The 13" pro-without-touch-bar is the upgrade path for air users who need something more powerful than the 12" macbook.
Submitted URI is a google AMP proxy
One claim they make surprises me: "Slice Intelligence is the only service to measure digital commerce directly from the consumer, across all retailers".
Does that mean they have data from Apple's sales (stores and online) or do they not consider Apple a retailer?
1. MBP hasn't seen an update in ages.
2. HN and Reddit tech groups are a terrible predictor of what general population think.
I've always thought that a big determining factor there is that Apple's laptop competitors generally have a dizzying array of different models all selling at once, so even when a line is doing well, it doesn't hold a candle to the MacBook just through dilution alone. Unless things have changed drastically since last I looked several years ago Asus, Lenovo, and Dell each sell more than 10 times as many different simultaneous quasi-competitive models than Apple, even if you restrict things to the high end.
Are the other laptops shown particularly strong sellers from those manufacturers? When I think of a current Dell MacBook competitor, I think of the XPS series. I wouldn't pick out any particular Asus machine, but I'd be surprised if their crown jewel was a Chromebook.
I'm actually most surprised by the relatively high sales of the Surface Book, which is definitely Microsoft's proper entry here, though I can't really tell how much of the difference is down to the Surface Book just costing much more than the other non-Apple entrants in the chart.
> Slice gets its data from e-receipts – not a browser, app or software installed by the end-user – so its measurement reflects comprehensive shopping behavior across multiple devices, over time which are key in an increasingly omnichannel retail world.
Pardon my ignorance, but what are e-receipts and how does Slice acquire them? Do retailers sell their receipts?
[1] https://intelligence.slice.com/apples-macbook-pro-launch/
> Slice Intelligence data comes from several sources, including the receipts in the e-mail inboxes of consumers who use the popular Slice online shopping service, Slice, and through strategic partners, including users of Slice’s API platform. Each e-mailed receipt contains a treasure trove of data.
Yeah no doubt reading people's emails is a treasure trove of data.
First is that it should allow applications to reduce the number of persistent UI elements they draw to screen without actually losing context.
Second is it will let me jettison the cognitive load of remembering so many application-specific keyboard shortcuts.
http://railsware.com/blog/2016/11/07/touch-bar-interface-for...
I'm not commented that count for November but for more growth in the future which is on sale twice a year.
Why compare only to 12 inch model? Why compare only to hybrids? (Which are rather niche in the first place)
It would be more accurate to compare this to overall Mac sales, since all of those other types of users are being funneled toward buying the new Macbook Pro.