Turns out she was clearing out the late Uncle's garage and stuff all around the house, and returning gifts from my family back to us, and doing the same with others (friends and relatives who had sent my uncle stuff). Mind you, he wasn't a hoarder. It was just things people gave him over the (many) years and he kept them because of the emotional element (friend, family) attached to such things.
Old and frail herself, I remember my Aunty spent a good few months -- almost a year -- shedding the baggage. The postage alone must've cost her a few 1000 $s. Not to mention packing, taking stuff to Good Will etc. It reminded me of the quote from Fight Club - "The things that you own end up owning you.".
On that day, a young 16 year old me decided to never store or keep anything with me and become a minimalist, even if it was an "emotional" thing. Because I don't want me or my surviving family to have to go through something like this ever! I also don't buy any gifts for anyone, and instead give cash whenever I am obligated to give a present or gift (think weddings, birthdays etc)
That she spent so long doing this also suggests it may have been cathartic for her.
That said, I keep very, very little myself, but for different reasons (I simply don't need anywhere near the stuff I have and tend to clean ruthlessly every now and again).
I will also suggest that gifts given years ago have far less value now.
I wondered why it was so similar, even though all the cultures involved were completely different. The other thing that puzzled me was that Sweden has a nearly infinitely superior social safety net to the US. So why, despite free education, job training, and plenty of resources to get a foothold, did these people lash out like many minorities in the US?
My aha moment was that it just had to do with being a minority culture. That's all it is. When a group's culture norms and values are not accepted/tolerated by the majority, the minority group has a hard time being a part of society. Even in a peaceful, tolerant place like Sweden.
It helped me open my own eyes as a white man, and now I can see this sort of thing playing out all around me. It's also universal, no matter when you go to in the world.
There is one major and rather sad exception though: when a white person or group is the minority in a place, it is not likely they will experience the same effects. Whiteness, and white culture seems to be universally desired (at least from my limited experience).
You can trade this for everything else - the exchange rate is up to you.
My takeaway was: Everyone's time is worth something.
As you make the mass of the larger object greater and greater, it becomes clear that eventually the escape velocity can be greater than the speed of light.
That's all a black hole is: A gravity well strong enough that even light itself cannot escape.
I knew this already to some extent, but the simplicity of the math really stunned me.
a rocket takes off. let's say it's going upwards at 1 m/s at some short time after takeoff. why can't it then reduce (not to zero) acceleration such that it stays going upwards at 1 m/s all the way out of the gravity well? don't aim for escape velocity, keep the velocity at exactly 1 m/s until you're out.
yes, I know - Tsiolkovsky, reaction mass, delta-v etc etc clearly that's wildly impractical
but MUST the rocket achieve its 'escape velocity' in order to escape? why can't we have a casual stroll out of the gravity well?
escape velocity applies for an unpowered vehicle, right? throw a rock, it's gotta be going at least at the escape velocity or it won't escape. but throw a rock that's propelling upwards itself all the way out ...
if I want to climb stairs, I propel myself gradually on every step, I don't require that I launch myself off step 1 with the speed to get me to the top.
what am I missing here?
Escape velocity is essentially the velocity an object must start out with to move towards an asymptotically infinite distance from the gravity well without additional thrust. That last bit is what makes it escape velocity. The gravity well will slow the object to near zero velocity but the object's distance will eventually overcome the gravity before it reaches zero or negative velocity.
Your example of moving at a constant speed of 1 m/s is only achievable with constant thrust to cancel gravity, thereby stopping the object from slowing during its ascent. If the object has achieved its escape velocity, no additional thrust is needed. One is not better than the other, it's just a matter of what is more practical in terms of fuel or travel time.
and if it's not, taking that to its logical conclusion - why do we NEED to go faster than the speed of light to escape from inside the schwarzschild radius of a black hole? can't we leave under constant thrust at 1 m/s?
Heading up from Earth, you are facing a deceleration of 9.8 m/s/s, so you need to apply enough force to counter that. The amount of force depends on payload, e.g., a little plastic drone don't need so much, a Saturn V carrying something to high orbit needs a whole lot.
Escape velocity is the velocity at which no further thrust is required. That's the key point: The object is travelling away from the well so fast that it is already going fast enough to overcome all of the rest of the gravitational drag it will experience until it hits micro/zero-G.
Rockets need constant thrust (constant force and acceleration) to overcome the constant force and acceleration of gravity).
If you accelerated a human being to escape velocity at the surface of the Earth, you would concuss them to death (and likely organ damage them to death).
A photon starts life at C, whatever C is in its current medium.
But does that same restriction prevent a rocket which wants to coast at 1m/s - under constant acceleration - from the surface to infinity?
I.e.: is the schwartzchild radius only a point of no return to light, not rockets?
And if not a hard limit to rockets - oh, I guess that's fun to know :-)
(Yes clearly utterly impractical - trying to understand if there's any fundamental reasons at play here)
Even so, assuming that we can apply classical thought to the problem: the simplest roadblock to rockets escaping from a black hole is that their change in mass per time unit multiplied by their velocity must at least partially exceed the gravitational pull.
Either you utilize ungodly amounts of fuel per second or you already have a crazy-high velocity or some combination of both. The math just makes it infeasible. There's limits on mass you can have and eject, and limits on attainable speed.
Since truth isn't determined by where you happen to be born, it seemed unlikely that my family's God was the one true God while all the others were false.
That's the "aha" moment that changed the course of my life.
Well, that and learning Bayes' theorem.
"I believe in one fewer than you"
It helped me understand functional programming too.
TL;DR quantum mechanics made me realise that all my toys were doomed but that I managed to secure some of their essence
I didn't want that (not sure what english word would fit here) and pulled out the cable and the plug broke. My father was annoyed/angry and i was crying because we nearly didn't drive to that electronic store.
I realized two things: 1. enviousness/distrust/jealousy is stupid 2. me being angry/crying about a situation i can't change doesn't change that situation
I got less emotional/more rational after this event.
I also think that this was one key point to become a nihilist.
I should get off HN.
I can't get my head around how sales could work efficiently with B2Cs in general.
For consumer products, look at how competitors do it. What looks like it is successful? Try it. Put proper metrics and A/B testing on everything you try.
If you set up a system that generates more value than it costs, you have a business. The difference between how much it makes vs how much it costs is your profit.
This time I got nothing and I asked my dad why after we came out. He said "I dont know, but you seamed really cranky." and I realised that my attitude affects the attitude of others.
Even if you give everyone 1 million dollars, NOT everyone will become rich (wealthy) because eventually this money would flow from your hands to the hands of someone that creates value. And you'd end up with the same poor/rich social strata, but now with high inflation.
Wealth is value creation. Money is just a medium.
Luck + [hard work|skills|knowledge]
You could be lucky and then not know what you are doing and fail.
You can know a ton and just not be in the right place.
It is that magic elusive combo.
I tell my kids you can only control one side of that equation. Learn as much as you can.
I'm not sure if I remember correctly but it was either Peter Thiel or Malcolm Gladwell that mentioned (in one of their books)how much luck and knowing the right people can make all the difference in the world. It makes sense because I know firsthand that the smartest folks are not necessarily the most savvy business people and a great product with good customer service may not be enough. Getting your foot in the door or knowing someone who can open a door can be a huge deal.
I laughed hysterically.
I enjoy Wittgenstein, but I think Godel is a far more important figure.
But mostly laugh.