Also, for third party recruiting, I've never asked for anything related to an SSN. The hiring company may ask for that for a background check, if it is contingent on an offer, but not from me.
I'm wondering if this another situation where the recruiter is not in the country the job is in, because someone wanted to pay pennies on the dollar.
My main problem with gov.uk is this fault to make clear the position of its advice in respect of the law, IMO it should link the appropriate legislation/caselaw as citations to prove the position it contends.
For example, at specific jobs in the government you get extra holidays if you're above a certain age. Why they think older people deserve more holiday is beyond me. It has nothing to do with how long you've worked there since a 29 year old that has worked there in 10 years wouldn't get as much vacation as a 40-year old that recently was hired. It has nothing to do with experience. Just age.
I can say as a young developer, I have felt this age thing several times at companies. They just don't give you the same salary or take you as serious because of the age. It doesn't matter how skilled you are or how much value you provide to the company.
Yes, that's usually how that works. Note also the salary aspect the OP already pointed out: they can get away with paying a younger person less, because this discrimination is industry wide and extremely entrenched.
It is hard for me to say if this is justified. Perhaps you could talk with more people about this (in neutral manner) and see why is it actually like this?
Just like there are many 20-something that have children and a full schedule and maybe even health issues.
But I really think that it is a good thing that it is not dependent on working within a single company as I have feeling that different kind of loyalty programs are approaching the serfdom in the longer run, as people are afraid to leave as they would not receive the level of compensation from somewhere else.
PS. I do not think that it is fair that some childless 40-year old are free riding on top of the society.
Now, everyone gets the same amount of holidays, i.e. younger employees get as much as the older ones, not the other way around.
Always be cautious when people are talking about how much value they themselves provide to the company. It's rarely in line with what the employers see. I've worked with a number of developers who've only a few years experience and think they're hot shots, but they leave such a mess behind them that others have to clean up.
Another thing is that older employees tend to be more reliable, and experience also counts. Yes, we all know the superstar workaholic at 25 and the no-hoper 50-year-old, but I'm talking general demographics. The older a person, the less likely they are to job-hop as well.
I mean seriously, how many 29-year-old developers are there in 2016 that have worked in the same place for 10 years?
There's no need to reveal that information until you've at least got a firm job offer.
But in the US you can really easily get DoB from the SSN.
The interview training at my company mentioned age as one of many things we were forbidden to ask about.
SSN? It was so obviously disallowed it was never mentioned.
This might be different depending on the country. I've seen CVs that have SSN/DOB/Marriage/Picture/Driver License because where they are located that's normal info to have on there.
In one instance the agency asked for the full NI number, probably because it's easier to ask/parse than the last 4 chars for some people, not due to Capita requirements.
The tiny bit of searching I've done so far have Capita including text similar to "We're an equal opportunities employer".
I know a couple of politicians who'd be interested too.
It's hard to see online as it's the recruitment agency who ask for it as they have to then input it into Capita's systems. But certainly any contract role for a government agency in Blackpool is likely to be the DWP, they recruit through Capita who definitely have this requirement.