>Remember the server sending out emails
Interesting 'fact' to cite. How many emails did that server send again?
Interesting 'fact' to cite. How many emails did that server send again?
But they should not censor posts under any circumstances, even that one. The problem is the way stories trend and the order in which the feed is presented. The current algorithms and 'like' counting maximize shocking statements that confirm world views exactly because that will maximize user retention. Accuracy is completely deprecated.
Facebook knows this and is well aware that nudity (let alone porn) would overwhelm their site because it would be overwhelmingly favored by their systemic selection process. So rather than fix the process they censor that. This leaves things like accusing people of satanism or other false inciting statements to bubble up instead.
Unfortunately, facebook has no fiscal incentive to fix this. And it may not be a coincidence that UKIP, Trump, AfD, Le Pen expanded greatly after the emergence of facebook.
The reason I count the story as false is that all the available evidence points to it being an ordinary mass mailing system: the horde of similar domains owned by Cendyn for the other hotels they do business with, the e-mails from it that have been found, the long trail of evidence showing Cendyn have been in this business for two decades and have had the Trump Organisation as a customer for 9 years, the existence of numerous DNS lookups not in the original logs offered by those pushing the story... When the only evidence is misinterpreting ordinary, boring activities, then it's a conspiracy theory. This is why it hung around for months without any of the publications that were offered it taking the story.