India's copyright proposal: DRM circumvention OK if no intent to infringe
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
No, instead what they are after is further restriction on fair use and preventing threats to their business model from open source software and domestic procurement policies. What a surprise.
Recall that in February IIPA requested that Canada be placed on the 301 watchlist as well: http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88127/iipa-demands-canada-be-pu...
Even if they aren't it would be whirlwind of irony.
e.g. The price of buying a track is pretty high. $0.90 for a track in US is acceptable, but not in India where standard of living is not like other countries.
The chief reason piracy is a hit in India is due to stupid pricing. If a book costs $10, then it will surely be pirated by a lot number of people. Classical example was "Harry Potter" books. It was priced at 700INR IIRC. Not everyone can buy it. Pirated books were available at 150-200INR and sold like hot cakes.
Moral of the story: Fix your damn price and see the sales shoot up.
Besides, the western way is plain wrong, it's a big bet of them to gamble their employ-ability on IP, and it will go sour on them, no matter how many military efforts used.
The IPAA people have to jail every digital device in China, India, Mexico, and the like to close their content, overturn the doctrine of first sale, and permanently deny all fair use. They won't be able to.
Instead what happens is that technology development gets blocked in the countries IPAA runs. It's illegal to jailbreak, unlock, and otherwise innovate with cheap mass market technology in the USA. And that just means the Congress is sending the future to China. Or México. Or India. Or Canada, apparently, if this article is right.
https://media.defcon.org/dc-17/audio/DEFCON%2017%20Hacking%2...