The American model seems to have such narrow and badly paved sidewalks that no one uses them, so then you need wider streets to cater for the combined use by pedestrians, cyclists and cars.
The American model seems to have such narrow and badly paved sidewalks that no one uses them, so then you need wider streets to cater for the combined use by pedestrians, cyclists and cars.
I grew up in suburban Dallas, and there were sidewalks everywhere. The only neighborhoods I saw without sidewalks were older neighborhoods that always creeped me out when I was little... I always got the impression that they were dilapidated.
Here's an example from a neighborhood right near where I grew up: https://goo.gl/maps/qGSvbk4HdAM2
And even the six-lane arterials have sidewalks here: https://goo.gl/maps/DUR8mdVQysu and https://goo.gl/maps/hZ4dL3yj8F32
And for completeness, a sidewalk-less street in a nearby neighborhood: https://goo.gl/maps/TnQ8bogKttL2 -- that whole area just looks old, and the neighborhood gave me the creeps when I was a kid
I would definitely change the order from
road | sidewalk | lawn
to road | lawn | sidewalk
in those two cases. There is ample space, so why not make the sidewalk safer by putting a strip of grass between the sidewalk and the road.http://homeguides.sfgate.com/sidewalks-considered-homeowners...