Ugh, really hate work going this way. Slack is an all-day all-hands meeting with no agenda. I miss async email.
Ugh, really hate work going this way. Slack is an all-day all-hands meeting with no agenda. I miss async email.
I'm no big IRC user, but when I joined some of the open source IRC channels, there was activity all the time; how is that less distracting?
Also, do not disturb and 'quit' are always an option.
MSN/Skype/etc. are all IM-style clients, so you have to actually select a person to talk to rather than just dropping an @everyone. They vaguely support group chat but it's not the default. I would like Slack a lot more if they emphasized individual and ad-hoc group/topic chats. They support them, of course, but large channels are the main focus and the UI steers you there.
I'm not sure anybody really did, but you could...
Actually, the terrible UI may well be a benefit. I've worked in a company with heavy investment in Slack, too, and its ease of use I think contributed heavily to the low S:N ratio of channels with high population. Lync's group chat is so painful to use that, unless it's important, we don't.
I treat slack as an async alternative to voice and video... maybe I'm doing it wrong?
Through network effects and corporate norms.