No. Removing options seems to be a common trend in modern software design and I hate it. The prevailing wisdom seems to be that if there's a choice between doing something two different ways, rather than adding an option, the developer should pick the solution that fits 90% of their target audience and ignore the remaining 10%. The problem with that is that every time you make that decision, you ignore a different 10%, and eventually your software is only suitable for users who stay inside the box that the developers made for them, not the long tail of users with niche use cases. I think open source devs don't "get" this because they tend to write software to scratch their own itches and they often have their own niche use cases. Maybe the reason they had to scratch their own itch in the first place was because other software was too inflexible to fit their needs.

Of course, some open source projects do have this philosophy, and when they start removing options, I switch to something else. GNOME is a good example. I wish the current version of Nautilus (GNOME Files?) had half the options of the file managers that forked from earlier versions of Nautilus (Nemo and Caja,) because I actually use those options.