Brief Meditative Exercise Shown to Improve Cognition
sciencedaily.com
sciencedaily.com
So does this mean that meditation helps cognition, or listening to "The Hobbit" hurts cognition?
Its impact is profound. After a while, you realize that thoughts and your identification with a person arises out of this simple silent awareness. Thus the constant stream of thoughts related to "I" arise from this silence.
I am thus this pure awareness, not the mind or personality that I thought i was. The identification with the mind-created story crumbles and with that a huge amount of suffering, longing, craving etc. The freedom experienced is immense.
Once starts freeing from the mental conditioning that has happened since birth, so relationships, decision-making etc improve.
One can put one's mind to one task without thoughts interrupting. Also, a lot of inessential tasks, time-wasters etc have also dropped off. One can focus on important activities.
I believe this is due to increased levels of concentration (as indicated by the article).
http://www.mindfulnesstapes.com/ (I have not used these but it was a decent enough link to give an overview)
I call bullshit. Normal untrained adults would do far better than this on adaptive n-back. If this is true, it means sitting and listening to Tolkien is more damaging to your working memory than having a screwdriver jammed into your prefrontal cortex.
The study is available from http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training
Reading it, I see significant advantage for the meditating group on the 'Computer Adaptive 2-back task', but not the 1 v 10 difference cited. Specifically, it seems that according to figure 1, before the intervention, the average 'extreme hit rate' on the n-back was ~2 for the meditating group and ~3.5 for the Tolkienists, but after 4 sessions, the meditating group was scoring >9 while the Tokienists were ~5.
The only significant discussion of the 2-back is on pg 6:
> "Fig. 1 shows the significant group by session interaction found in the analysis on the extended hit rate from the computer adapted n-back task, F(1, 47) = 6.76, p = .01, g2 = .12. The meditation group, in contrast to the control group, had more extended hit runs. There was also a significant session effect, F(1, 47) = 18.78, p < .001, g2 = .29. Follow-up analyses on the speed measure of the n-back task did not show any evidence of an interaction effect F < 1, or an effect of session or group, Fs < 1."
I wonder if the control group had heard The Hobbit before.