Live Free or Die: The Origins of the Geek License Plate
wired.com
wired.com
1937 gamification, nice.
I always wondered why more countries didn't offer vanity license plates. It's a trivial service to offer in the internet age, and has the potential to bring in a nice additional lump of money every year for the government. Plus, it's just fun.
If there is a fee for these plates, it makes people more unequal than they already are in their relation to the state for no other reason than allowing the rich to show they are rich.
Many places take the approach that the state should never provide different classes of services depending on who can afford them or not.
In your view are turnpikes and toll bridges OK?
For private owned roads (or conceded to a private company for maintenance) they are OK of course, but not for state-maintained roads. Bridges are a bit different as they usually are much more expensive to build, but once the initial investment is recovered they should become toll-free IMO (once again, unless privately maintained).
However, I think your question has little to do with what I was talking about: a better comparison would be having a second set of publicly-built parallel roads with higher tolls for those who can afford them, or offering higher toll fees allowing a higher speed limit. I personally wouldn't be OK with this.
There's also often a whole suite of charity plates, where you can proudly display your support of XYZ for an additional fee, some of which is donated to charity. Growing up, I remember many people in Maine who thought the old lobster plates[1] were ugly enough to opt for the loonie plates[2].
[1] http://www.15q.net/us2/me00b.jpg
[2] http://www.maine.gov/dacf/parks/get_involved/images/loonPlat...
For instance, German license plate KA-WT 342 is from the City of Karlsruhe ("KA"), and is privately registered (letters after the dash).
KA-T 34H is a Karlsruhe privately-owned historic car (H at the end).
KA-4734 is a car owned by the Regierungsbezirk Karlsruhe (most likely a police car)
0 57-274 is a car owned by the embassy of Indonesia in Germany (0 for diplomatic, 57 for Indonesia)
BN-173-345H is a historic car owned by an UNHCR (173) employee with diplomatic immunity working from Bonn (BN). Cars owned by the UNHCR itself would be 0 173-788H...
This kind of quick-glance information gets lost when you introduce vanity plates.
We do have "Wunschkennzeichen", though, allowing you to choose the random letters and numbers from the pool of those combinations not yet used.
16-D-17891 : the 17891st car registered in Dublin, in the year 2016. They have recently introduced a third number in the year position to indicate 6 month sections (ie. 161 or 162).
Generally they follow a pre-1963 county-based system in monotonic sequential order but occasionally a profitable prefix arises; recently BIG nnnn where nnnn is integer. So they can reserve the 'nice' ones in the sequence e.g. BIG 1 and sell those on the market. But they don't sell them in advance of sequence.
Besides the motto and the big number, the plates carry the Compaq logo, "1999" (the year they were made), and the statement "LINUX is a Registered Trademark of Linus Torvalds."
Edit: It looks like if it's sequential, it would be a white plate, with California in cursive at the current (large) size, where the descender on the f almost touches the plate number, and it might have no subtitle or the sesquicentennial subtitle.
> DMV has the right to refuse any combination of letters and/or letters and numbers for any of the following reason(s): [...] it conficts with any regular license plate series issued.
My understanding is that all vanity plates are reviewed by at least one human, so it's possible they handle denying vanity plates that fit the sequential series that probably should have been denied in the online form.
[1] https://dmv.ca.gov/portal/wcm/connect/6d97bdef-c5b1-46ee-a55...
2B OR D4I go with a standard issue plate now on a totally generic car.