The world’s knowledge is being buried in a salt mine
bbc.com
bbc.com
If my calculations are correct, this should reduce the length of this neo-dark-age from 30,000 years to a mere 1,000.
... and I'm back from a bit of wikipedia rabbit hole. Found out even Elon Musk is a fan [1]
[1] http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/the-science-fiction-books-th...
One foundation will keep all of human knowledge, while the universe goes at war for 1000 years straight.
Spoiler Alert: A second foundation, secret and hidden even from the first one, will keep all of human knowledge as well and protect the first one.
They should also sell those tokens as a means of generating revenue. I'd buy some and hand them down.
The article also talks about the possibility of civilizations losing the ability to read in three generations, but there's no mention of a plan to deal with that. These archives would be mostly useless to an illiterate society, except maybe as objects of wonder or worship.
That would be an interesting challenge, actually -- how could you teach an illiterate, collapsed civilization to read if they don't have access to electronic gadgets like audio players, computers, monitors, or projectors?
My first thought is to have some audio on wax cylinders with hand-cranked players or something. But then there's no guarantee that the hearers will even speak the language. Assuming the language is similar enough, though, it would still be challenging to teach someone to read merely by such primitive audio recordings. They'd have to be paired with some visual aids, and the people listening would have to be really motivated to learn.
That is the point. http://memory-of-mankind.com/giftshop
Insta-edit: I see you also get a token with your tablet. Original article should be updated, then, because it says
> For this reason, Memory of Mankind will has engraved some small tokens with a map pinpointing the archives’ location, which they will then bury at strategic places around the world. Other tokens are being entrusted to 50 holders who will pass them onto the next generation.
... as if these are the only ones.
In any case, they should sell tokens for much cheaper. If more people buy them, (a) they'll make more revenue, and (b) there will be more maps scattered around the Earth.
For instance here in Kansas is a huge salt mine that Hollywood uses to store original prints of many many classic films and works.
In Kansas City Missouri is one of the largest underground limestone cavern converted to storage for all forms of records. From film to paper archives for government.
I imagine it's more coming than we think because it's not sexy and these types of facilities do not get much press.
Given the length of time imagined, I think the odds that the place is accessible by individuals or groups who believe they should destroy the data approaches 100%.
See the deliberate destruction of ancient sites all across the Middle East. See the sacking of Rome by the Vandals, the *goths, and the Normans. See the destruction of the Library of Alexandria. See the rise in religious extremists who seem specifically to hate artifacts belonging to other cultures on their soil.
How does a physical repository of human knowledge defend itself against this?
Multiple copies stored in multiple diverse locations in multiple ways.
> The token shows the location in such a way that a future civilization will be able to interpret its correct meaning. This will require a technical and scientific understanding which is comparable to our own. This is the guarantee that the archive is suitably protected from premature access. Only a civilization which fulfils these requirements will be able to find the archive as well as being able to process, decipher and comprehend its content. The depiction on the token: Two intersecting lines span a map of Europe.
Maybe fake but still food for thought.
On top of that languages like English, French and German are pretty "new", so to speak, I mean they're not older than 1000 years, at the most. I'm pretty sure most native English speakers need a "modernized" version of Chaucer's works (meaning a translation) in order to understand what he wanted to say, and the same goes for the French and Rabelais's "Gargantua and Pantagruel". 2,000 years ago no-one on this continent (Europe) was speaking neither French, nor English, nor German, so it's plausible that in another 2,000 years these languages will have changed to the point of becoming new ones.
Language can go extinct in a way that nobody can learn them anymore
Many languages have been lost and since recovered. In general, you want to have some knowledge of the language; for example, knowledge of Coptic (its modern descendant) was helpful in deciphering ancient Egyptian. Akkadian, a common language for old cuneiform texts, is a semitic language, like Hebrew and Arabic. Akkadian was lost, but Hebrew was preserved pretty well, and that helped in understanding Akkadian.
Sumerian is related to no known modern language. We can read it anyway, because mesopotamian scribal training documents, of which we have lots, specifically deal with training the student in Sumerian. Similarly, if German was lost, German records might still be salvageable if someone found an old German textbook for Japanese students and could figure out the Japanese.
A company called Fahrenheit 2451 makes sapphire disk that can withstand high temperatures and supposedly lasts one million years.
Fahrenheit 2451 is still tying to get funding but they seem to be able to make/grow the disks already.
All we want is for the information to be read by someone after that it doesn't matter what happens to the thing it's written on.
Well, a modern first-worlder wouldn't ignore a rock covered in writing, but peasants overwhelmingly do just that.
If you want durability, stone isn't a good choice either; poor communities repurpose worked stone into the things they want, because breaking up a big wall somebody else put up a long time ago is much easier than quarrying your own new stone and hauling it back to town. Tungsten would probably be a good choice -- a primitive society would be unable to melt it.
I assumed this was talking about modern people plundering the material. For them, sapphire has very low value.
For primitive people, sapphire might have higher value, although a large block would be very difficult to cut. Easy to smash, though. But any kind of stone (that could hold a carved message) would be extremely valuable, and very prone to plundering; plundering of stone buildings for material is routine throughout history, as I've already pointed out an inch or so away from this comment.
> Why is sapphire considered a precious stone?
Not for any intrinsic value. You might be interested to know that the 5 traditional precious stones are diamond (carbon), emerald (something complicated, green variety), sapphire (aluminum oxide), ruby (also aluminum oxide, red variety), and... amethyst, which is silicon dioxide, or quartz, one of the most common materials (and crystals) that exists. Amethyst is a purple variety. It was considered a precious stone because it was rare, and it is no longer considered a precious stone not because we learned to manufacture it, but because we discovered a gigantic cave full of amethyst in Brazil, source of amethyst to the world.
Maybe have a couple of those probes become read only after a couple of centuries (to avoid a hack/attack of overwriting and blowing away all data).
The moon has very few impacts with asteroids and very little geo activity.
I guess it also depends on what you want to store and what you use to store. There are crystals that could store data for pretty much eternity [1].
The problem with shoving stuff in a hidden salt mine is that no one (ie aliens, future people etc) will know where it is where as on the moon or satellite you can effectively have a much more salient sign of here is the data (ie what is worse the data is destroyed or the data is never found?).
[1] http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/17/technology/5d-data-storage-m...
The english article is not very extensive, but on the german one you'll see at least a few pictures of the storage https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbarastollen
The ‘reasonable worst case scenario’ for severe space weather is based on the Carrington event of 1859, aligned to our current understanding of the vulnerability of modern technologies... Research suggests that a reoccurrence of the Carrington Event has a 1% annual probability...
It is anticipated that the impacts would be:
- localised power outages;
- disruption of satellite operations, including to Global Navigation Satellite System outages (GPS) and SATCOM disturbances;
- disruption to High Frequency communications;
- increased radiation to aircrew and passengers in flight, particularly over polar regions; and
- further disturbances to small-part electronic systems.