A Quick Logic Lesson for Confused WikiLeaks Haters

Eye roll. So much strawman, call the fire marshal.

Whatever, people are upset because wl has abandoned their neutral position to take an active role in the election. From dodgy material from a foreign power that was encouraged by one of the candidates!

The retweet is just a proof point: guilt by association. And at some level it works. And may even be true sometimes.

So much passive aggressiveness at the start and end of the article that anyone sent this would roll their eyes and close it.

So who did the author write it for? Themself?

This is brilliant, and you would think, stupidly obvious, but the hysteria surrounding wikileaks is unbelievable. People whose work I greatly respect (eg:greatdismal) doing the exact thing described in the article. Have to put on mute until the election is over.