Failure to find sexual partner is now a disability, says WHO
express.co.uk
express.co.uk
"Under the new rules, heterosexual single men and women and gay men and women who want to have children will now be given the same priority as a couple seeking IVF because of medical fertility problems. "
I am quite happy that the WHO is taking that stance to support the human rights of non heterosexual couples.
I feel like the people who are jumping all over the use of the term 'disability' are doing so disingenuously rather than standing up and saying that they believe heterosexual couples are inherently more worthy of having children.
Well, it _is_ the Express.
We're evolution-wise ready to mate at puberty (11-14 y.o), and that's probably the age when pre-civilization humans were sexually active.
That's been pushed much father today.. and it probably varies from say an average age of 16 to 25 when people are active (varies from culture to culture). Most cultures also look down upon pre-marital sex, and anyone who wishes to give in to the evolutionary signals to have sex earlier is probably following a path frowned upon by most societies.
So my hypothesis is that our current-milieu is at odds with our biology, and (possibly) a source of a lot of issues in the world. Sex is at the core of being human, and when you have religions and cultures frowning down upon all but certain white-listed methods of going about it, at an age much past the biological starting point, we're sowing seeds that can affect the species' longevity.
Thoughts?
Don't you want nice people have a place to park?!