But mostly because I don't want him waking up at night screaming from nightmares. I like my dearly won sleep.
But mostly because I don't want him waking up at night screaming from nightmares. I like my dearly won sleep.
You made the choice to have a child. You made the choice to entertain them with YouTube. The possibility of them seeing an advertisement for alcohol (my goodness! Your son will turn into a tattooed hooligan in a week!) is not sufficient reason for handing the internet over to state censorship.
In short, stop trying to make society raise your kid for you. Give independence and self-responsibility a try, you might like it.
In the UK advertisers are forbidden from advertising alcohol to children.
Here's the regulators page for adverts aimed at children: https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Hot-Topics/Children-an...
Here's their page for adverts about alcohol (note that some of those ads were online): https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Hot-Topics/Alcohol.asp...
There's currently a gap in regulation. App makers have apps targeted at children (and with an age range of eg 4+); those apps carry ads; those ad networks use information about the phone owner to decide the age suitability of ad.
This loophole is likely to close in 2017 or 2018
I do agree that apps (or videos) directed at children shouldn't show non-child-safe ads. I just don't see what does that have to do with the proposal under discussion.
I'm not trying to say that it causes alcoholism. I'm just responding to someone dumping a useless anecdote.
Maybe don't let your kid that DOESNT EVEN READ yet zombiefy itself?
Maybe complain to Google/Apple about particular ads? Install some ad blocking software? Pay for youtube red? Purchase the ad-less versions of the apps?
Basically don't think that your inability to deal with the world warrants nationwide heavy handed regulation, please