It seems that if the ID is provided free of charge, then it does not burden the individual any more than normal voting does.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Marion_County_Elec...
It seems that if the ID is provided free of charge, then it does not burden the individual any more than normal voting does.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Marion_County_Elec...
Let's say you want to obtain a voter ID in South Carolina, for example, because you have no other photo ID. You'll need to present a birth certificate. What, can't find yours? Good luck, you'll need a photo ID to obtain a new copy of that birth certificate.
Perhaps you are an 18-year old high schooler in Alabama eligible to vote for the first time. You don't have a driver's license, because you can't afford a car and don't drive. Your closest DMV is 40 miles away and only open one day out of the week. There's no public transportation, so you'll have to coordinate a ride with someone who can take you on a day the DMV is open. Previously, this voter would be able to show up to their polling site on the day of the election with a bank statement and vote.
It would be one thing if voter fraud was prevalent and all these new measures needed enacted, but there isn't. The rate of fraud in U.S. elections is close to zero. Instead, they're yet another set of hurdles voters, particularly minorities and the poor, face when asserting their right to vote.
You're hypotheticals are just that: hypothetical.
These are not hypotheticals, there are specific examples of legislators being caught on the record trying to craft voter ID laws such that they had the greatest effect upon poor and minority voters. We are still waiting on your to address these issues instead of repeatedly posting a link to this one case that happened to be the trigger for all of these laws that have now been found to be illegal.
If Law X is legal, and I support Law X, then stop telling me Law Y is illegal -- it's irrelevant.