Very nice article, but the claims are so far from what is practiced in the industry nowadays (see all companies working with tons of data and popping up big data solutions).
So, while it might be perfectly true it somehow misses some big point.
So, while it might be perfectly true it somehow misses some big point.
I dare you to demonstrate that the "big data solutions" guarantee logical and semantic correctness the way true RDBMSs do. Without that, garbage in garbage out. But because those "solutions" are so complex that nobody understand them, including those who designed them, their results are BELIEVED to be correct, which is not the same thing as being correct.