The closest thing we'll ever get to an official Apple blog
stevemail.tumblr.com
stevemail.tumblr.com
Bill Gates on the iPad (http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/feb/12/ipad-bill-g...)
Certainly Gruber is a fan of Apple, but so are a lot of people if Apple's consistently increasing sales are any indication. I get sick of people labeling him a "shill" because he happens to like the company, and/or has developed an insight into what Apple's management is thinking. Throwing around those sorts of accusations is the paranoid style of tech punditry, and a disservice to rational discussion.
As a daily reader of his blog, there still is this deep, deep seated arrogance against any company other than Apple. Apple gets a fair set of positive and negative coverage, but any other company almost always gets _only_ negative coverage.
For example, the current frontpage has depressing things to say about Flip(Cisco), Adobe, RIM, Motorola, Goldman Sachs, Palm, Sony and Ning.
Positive mentions: Just 2. One each for Adobe(this is rare, and only because of hard evidence -- 2x speedup in Photoshop CS5) and Google. (One neutral mention of Unity).
The more worrying concept is that he is widely read by all of Apple's employees, all the way up to the top. Clearly some of his views resonate _in_to the company as well, so even if he is not on their payroll, I very much consider him an Apple evangelist, and take every negative comment of his with a huge pinch of salt.
http://stevejobsemailreplys.tumblr.com/
http://fromstevejobs.tumblr.com/
http://stevejobssays.tumblr.com/
http://emailsfromsteve.tumblr.com/
http://saysstevejobs.tumblr.com/
(from http://www.macstories.net/news/steve-jobs-email-replies-now-...)
As mrduncan noted, these all seem to be inspired by John Gruber's tweet asking for such a site:
And oh, I wouldn't be surprised if Apple PR decides to do an "Email to Steve Jobs" section of the Apple site now.
For instance, I check HN a lot, and I used to check reddit a lot, and I've heard of perhaps only two of these emails. Most of them do not cast Jobs in an overtly positive light. It's a publicist's nightmare, basically, because they lose control of the image.
And Apple is all about image. I don't know, I just think that there will be a lot of internal pressure on Jobs to stop emailing people who may go and repost the conversation verbatim. He might not stop, we all know that Jobs has a general contempt for business-as-usual and does what he wants, but making a thing like this just seems to kind of be "looking a gift horse in the mouth", as it were, because most CEOs have the sense not to even try personal responses to customer complaints or feedback for the reasons mentioned in this post.
It also helps make the company seem more accessible ("hey, Jobs will answer an average Joe's email, he loves us!") when in reality Apple PR is notorious for ignoring the press unless it serves them.