All of that is likely in their academic paper, but it is behind a pay-wall: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/03/11/0914826107.abst...
The short story is that there's no good answer to the question of likeliness to make a moral decision based on theory of mind, because they scored the results on a 7-point scale of permissible vs. forbidden.
But, their error margins are very good. Here is an exert from the combined analysis of the two experiments: "TMS site specifically affected judgments of attempted harms: TMS to the RTPJ vs. the control site resulted in participants’ judging attempted harms as more permissible [independent samples t test based on the item analysis: t(87) = 3.6, P = 0.001]."