Contra Costa: Judge jails judicial reform advocate who discussed divorce online
eastbaytimes.com
eastbaytimes.com
But god, what a shitty article. The "judicial reform advocate" angle is a total red herring. That's not why the guy was jailed--he was held in contempt because he violated a restraining order not to discuss private information that came to light in the context of a court proceeding. That restraining order would have been totally enforceable if the ex-wife's lawyer hadn't screwed up by filing that private information without seal.
The fact that you, me, and most everyone else knows that throughout the United States unsealed court records are considered public information makes it strain the credulity that this judge (a professional) would not know that fact. Combine that with a plausible motive (that this man's political activism had just strengthened the judicial oversight body which had censured this judge numerous times) and we have the appearance of judicial impropriety.