Jakarta's Aeromovel – mass transit powered by pressurized air [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taman_Mini_Indonesia_Indah
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHS_23_Aero_Movel_Indonesia
http://www.tamanmini.com/sarana-keliling/shs-23-aeromovel-in...
It runs in a six-station, 3.2km unidirectional loop.
Although it has been a project for more than 30 years, it is something locals are really proud. The same local company implemented both projects (the brazilian one and this in Jarkata).
One of the "trains" stopped at a station:
https://goo.gl/maps/5Ju92GQQmPP2
Further evidence, if you start on Google streetmap here you can see one of the trains rounding a curve into one of the high level stations and then departing:
https://goo.gl/maps/oXD8gkXaHcM2
https://goo.gl/maps/VDcCFP9rvAK2
https://goo.gl/maps/Sa17Q5P7FNS2
https://goo.gl/maps/xZsViC3ctER2
One of the air release gates mentioned in the film:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_railway#Aeromovel
They're working on a new 3.75mi line in downtown Canoas BR. http://www.aeromovel.com.br/en/projeto/canoas/
In this 1993 article, they say this cost $9m US to construct (using local labor and materials) and $500k/yr to operate. http://articles.latimes.com/1993-01-17/business/fi-2255_1_tr...
That's a lot cheaper than light rail.. but it's hard to do a fair comparison, because of the labor difference and light rail projects (at least in the US) include stuff like tunnels, re-routing highways, etc.
But there are a bunch of unused concrete pylons that look just like the ones in the video on certain roads. I was told that was for a light rail system that got cancelled due to rising cost issues. Not sure it was this though, a Japanese contractor that was shafted by the government was mentioned.
Various Jakarta monorail / light rail projects have failed in the meantime, however recently work has begun on an elevated light rail and it looks to be making good progress.
There is still a pub called the atmospheric railway inn in Starcross, which the train would have passed.
The Aeromovel is about as low-tech as the Hyperloop is high tech. Of course it addresses a different part of the transit problem space, but it looks like it actually works, and it's easy to see why it's really cheap.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_railway#Aeromovel
The size of the air duct is much larger than the 19th century systems, and the pressure is quite low, only 0.16 atmosphere. There is a switch for this system, and it's not too big.[1] (Monorail switches tend to be bulky.)
Another system (4.7km) is under construction, or at least contracted for, in Canoas, Brazil. This is planned to be expanded into a sizable metro system.
Aeromovel probably would have been an improvement over that cable-hauled kludge at the Oakland airport. That cost $484 million for a 3.2 mile system with two cars. Only two cars; there cannot be more, because of the way the cable system works.
[1] http://www.eureka.tu.chiba-u.ac.jp/download/jseht/Aeromovel%...
Source: my dad worked on constructing the thing
Is the electricity generation clean? Unlikely in SEA.
I don't think they really cared about that though.. this was a pilot project
No doubt true, but possibly the wrong question to be asking. Is a coal fired plant outside of Jakarta going to produce less pollution than all those buses and cheap motorcyles generating their pollution right where all the people are?