The US just bombed Yemen, and no one's talking about it
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
See a pattern - you can rely on US to make the worst choice in the majority of cases.
The only sensible strategy in the Middle East is to support the strongman as long as he keeps the place together and switch to the new one, when the old no longer is. Realpoltik 101 - just listen to Kissinger.
The question was what candidates think - Trump don't have the brain to coherently describe that position - although his stronman admiration shows he instinctively gets it. And Clinton lacks the balls - because the whole left will jump against her.
> Yet we’ve heard absolutely nothing about this from our presidential candidates.
= it's not about it being unreported in the news.
I can agree that the election sells more ads than substantive coverage of world events and did learn some things from the Source piece.
There was some speculation on reddit whether it was "someone trying to draw US into the conflict" or "US poking the bees nest, seeking excuse to get involved". Now that US got involved, we can speculate if the admirals are idiots, or is the plan working..
Matt Lee of the Associated Press asked State Department spokesman John Kirby what the difference between US involvement in Yemen and Russian involvement in Syria is, to which there was no answer.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-co...