I'm talking about the tube pressurization, which is much much worse.
I'm talking about the tube pressurization, which is much much worse.
I also think you are overestimating the number of terrorists running around with RPGs.
EDIT: Of course, when all is said and done, the additional engineering requirements to make it safe may also make it economically unfeasible, in which case, your original point about the dangers would be essentially correct.
Terrorist with an RPG is just an example, it can be anything - a drone with C4, somebody throwing a long string of burning thermite, or just a gasoline canister set on fire.
This reminds me of the people who were very vocal about automated cars needing to be perfect before they could replace human drivers. They seem to have quieted down as the technology gets closer to actual deployment. I suppose that will also be the case here if the hyperloop becomes reality.
Also it's a much easier target. Planes are only reachable to the terrorists during takeoffs/landings. And even then, it's not exactly easy to hit a plane moving at 300mph with an RPG/truck/drone.
The rest of your argument about automated cars is the classic example of straw man.
And to address your original point in a horribly sarcastic way, if only someone had invented bulkhead technology...
You might derail one train, if lucky, not every train on the track. We have defect detectors:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defect_detector
Also trains, especially in the US, are much slower, and derailing one will probably kill a few passengers, but most will be fine. It's much more damaging to target bridges, which terrorists did:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafiganj_train_wreck (130 dead)
Crashing a plane into a highway overpass will do even less damage, because cars can stop very quickly when they see a problem.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSPi1JFx4_-Gz0Fm0qq2K...