Poor or even worse bullshit articles and poor citations just make the backlash worse, and even harder to get accepted without having to prove I'm at the least a mythical 2x-5x developer.
But, here you go, let's try showing you a survey and a study amongst the top Google hits for "women have to work harder for the same recognition" and see what you think:
https://news.virginia.edu/content/surveys-british-and-americ...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseackerman/2013/02/24/superio...
---
[1] http://bigthink.com/think-tank/the-backfire-effect-why-facts...
When I discuss these and sometimes any issue really with engineers or scientists, I try to find technical research papers with null hypothesizes and methodology.
My point being for technical people like engineers, you aren't convincing a lot of people with light fluffy pieces without links to hard data, in fact you get them even more entrenched in their current way of thinking because they think you don't have real scientific evidence.
I've found in personal experience, technical people are far more open minded then the general population, but they tolerate far less bullshit.
I don't understand what you're looking for. I don't have juicy information you don't have, so I imagine if there is something out there that you searched and couldn't find, I don't think I'll succeed in finding it either.
I guess that means all that remains is intolerable bullshit?