Our policy of using them so freely on the other hand...
...until the 'other guys' start doing the same. Then it becomes a heinous, unfair act of terror.
That said, here's the question:
How would you approach eliminating terrorists, terrorist training camps, terrorist strongholds and terrorist leaders with zero collateral damage? Of course, knowing full well that the collateral damage is split between terrorist supporters and absolutely innocent people.
Remember, these are the very people who not only want to but have killed thousands, tens of thousands, perhaps even hundreds of thousands innocent civilians throughout the world. If they could detonate a massive bomb in the middle of a stadium full with 50,000 people, they would.
In other words, they are coming to kill you, your family, friends and loved ones. What do you do?
In many ways it's the old "If you could save a thousand lives by taking one, would you?"
I've heard opinions ranging from "just get out of the middle east and let them rot in hell" to "one nuke, one time and it's over". Not sure what the answer is. Always interested in hearing what others might thing the solution could be.
The weapons industry is sick this way. The US doesn't want to sell? OK, maybe Russia does. Or some third party who knows how to get them, whether a front for a country or not.
Truly sick.