Truth is almost never comfortable. And, generally, ignorance is bliss (which is true, however uncomfortable that may be).
If you accept you're a conscious imperfect animal, being able to communicate with other conscious beings is in itself a pretty nice deal.
You can't change the truth, so it cannot be put as the problem, the problem is the expectations we are given while growing up just to discover most of it is bullshit.
You could also try to put the ideal in it's place, as an horizon, something you walk towards in order to progress, but it'd be foolish to expect to get there, let alone demand to be there already.
I was talking about less fundamental truths, such as the realization that one's parents are idiots, life is being wasted, every minute a person is getting murdered somewhere in a most horrifying way, girlfriend is getting ugly, etc. Try to get comfortable with that...
My impression of "transcendence" is the ability to consciously take these signals as input, rather than subconsciously by following feelings. The prerequisite to this is a deep understanding of oneself, the different signals one can perceive, and what real-world phenomena correspond to those signals (vs what the signals themselves say).
There's also a lot of anecdotal evidence that various psychedelics aid in this process, with one theory being that because they often delay or otherwise distort the link between your perception and reality, you have to think logically about how to compensate for the difference between your perception and what you consciously know to be reality. Throw the especially pensive nature induced by some variants of marijuana or LSD into the mix, and you've got a recipe for enlightenment.
By the way, if that sounds plausible, consider that the euphoria associated with consuming those substances may be an evolutionary adaptation. Seeing really is believing; humans have a hard time properly attributing weight to factors they can't directly perceive (even our own suffering isn't enough to motivate us if it's far enough in the future to be abstract to our current selves). As a result, most people don't acquire the ability to consciously perceive their input signals (and compensate for them) until the difference between perception and reality is made literally visible, e.g. by psychedelics.
People do that all the time, and for a very good reason. Life in a society where everyone only speaks truth would be impossible (which is why, for instance, atheism is not very popular).
As I read more and more, thought about various things that I read, observe things happening around me, read history and think the need of violence and such stuff, it got me various perspectives. I would hate anything but the truth.
One's opinion about something is not necessarily truth and we get mostly uncomfortable about someone else's opinion. But dont we not want the true fact even if it is uncomfortable?
I'm struggling to understand what you mean by this.
Nah. Ignorance now usually means a whole lot of pain later.