> As a Meyers Briggs ENTP I find the descriptions of an ENTP personality flattering and desirable.
Of course, they're your descriptions and therefore they're biased. (Incidentally, I'm an ENTP too).
> As a Meyers Briggs ENTP I find the descriptions of an ENTP personality flattering and desirable.
Of course, they're your descriptions and therefore they're biased. (Incidentally, I'm an ENTP too).
Well, if you take a 2000 word write-up about your own type, there may be some thought-provoking generalizations either about your own type or about patterns that are consistent when people of different types interact... things which derive from what you believed about yourself but are consequences of the MBTI's generalizations about human interactions.
But I agree, it would be interesting to incorporate the sort of information in the MBTI along with less subjective metrics and come up with a more rich analysis.
Right, but how many of those generalizations are actually verified? The specifics are studied to be consistent, but there are very few generalizations backed up by data.