there is nothing clinical or formal about it
But do you think he's wrong? and if so, where?
But do you think he's wrong? and if so, where?
His philosophy is a prism--like analyzing a story in terms of Jungian archetypes, or a picture in terms of phallic imagery. There isn't a falsifiable theory in there anywhere. Yes this applies to Freud too, which is why his ideas have largely been discredited and ignored in mainstream psychology for years.